Legal Opinion
Outdoor American Corp. v. City of Philadelphia
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided June 30, 1964No. 14697PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEAHY, District Judge.
Plaintiffs are publishers and distributors of nudist magazines and paperback books. In October, 1963, defendants confiscated a large quantity of plaintiffs’ publications and arrested and are prosecuting plaintiff Rosenbloom in the Pennsylvania criminal court for violation of the Pennsylvania statute which makes dealing in obscene publications a felony.1 Suit was brought by plaintiffs in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania for a declaratory judgment and injunctive relief under the Civil Rights Act.2 Upon defendants’ motion, the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Douglas v. City of JeannetteSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Refoule v. EllisDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1947
- Toth v. SilbertDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1960
- Grove Press, Inc. v. CalissiDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1962
3Cited by10 opinions
- National Land & Investment Co. v. SpecterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- Greater Fremont, Inc. v. City of FremontDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1968
- Richard Wallach v. City of PagedaleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
- National Land & Investment Company v. Arlen SpecterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- Pressie Hughes v. District Attorney for Atlanta, Georgia, County at Fulton, and Attorney Generalfor Atlanta, Georgia, No. 30505 Summary Calendar. Rule 18, 5th Cir. See Isbell Enterprises, Inc v. Citizens Casualty Co. Of New York, 5th Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part ICourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.