Bostwick v. Elton
New York Supreme Court
Appeal from, an order of special term, allowing an injunction, and the appointment of a receiver in an action brought by the plaintiff as receiver, appointed in supplementary proceedings. The facts will sufficiently appear in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
By the court, Rosekrans, J.
The plaintiff was not entitled to an order of injunction, nor an order for the appointment of a receiver of the property which was the subject of this action, unless he furnished to the court some evidence that he was entitled to the relief demanded in his complaint, or had an apparent right to the property. He claims that he has been appointed, under proceedings supplementary to execution, receiver of. the property of all the defendants except William Elton, and he alleges that William Elton has possession of the assigned property or its proceeds, as assignee of…
2Cited by4 opinions
- State v. McGaheyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1904
- Cushing v. RuslanderNew York Supreme Court · 1888
- State ex rel. Register v. PattersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1904
- Hecker v. MayorNew York Supreme Court · 1865