Legal Opinion

Hodnett v. Boston & Albany Railroad

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 26, 1892PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.

This action is brought by the plaintiff as next of kin of the deceased, under the St. of 1887, c. 270, § 2, which provides that “ where an employee is instantly killed, or dies without conscious suffering, . . . the next of kin, provided that such next of kin were at the time of the death of such employee *87dependent upon the wages of such employee for support, may maintain an action for damages,” etc. The employee was not instantly killed. It was therefore incumbent on the plaintiff to prove that the deceased died without conscious suffering, and also that she at the time of his death was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McCarthy v. Supreme Lodge New England Order of ProtectionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
  2. Mulchahey v. Washburn Car Wheel Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
  3. Daly v. New Jersey Steel & Iron Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Boyle v. Columbian Fire Proofing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902
  2. Mulhall v. FallonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
  3. Herrick's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  4. Bortle v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Fierro's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API