Legal Opinion · Dissent

Veronee v. Charleston Consol. Ry. & Lighting Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided August 13, 1929No. 12718Published

1DissentJustice Cothran

(dissenting) : I think that there are two very substantial grounds upon which the defendant is entitled to a rehearing of this appeal:(1) His Honor, the circuit Judge, should have sustained the objection of the defendant based upon the disqualification of the panel of jurors which tried the case.(2) The defendant was clearly entitled to a charge of its second request, as it was presented, the modification of which constituted reversible error.

The second ground has, I think, been sufficiently elabor rated in the dissent which I have filed. I shall therefore direct my attention to the first…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. MittleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1922
  2. In Re State Ex Rel. MunnSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API