Legal Opinion

In re: Sherman Wilson Hicks, Jr. and Dianna Lynn Hicks, Debtors

United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Arkansas

Decided February 26, 2026No. 2:25-bk-71560Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS FORT SMITH DIVISION In re: SHERMAN WILSON HICKS, Jr. and No. 2:25-bk-71560 DIANNA LYNN HICKS, Debtors Chapter 13 ORDER AND OPINION DENYING MOTION TO AVOID LIEN On January 20, 2026, the debtors filed an amended motion to avoid a lien [the motion] held by the City of Fort Smith [the City].1 (Dkt. No. 51.) On February 10, the City filed a response to the motion. (Dkt. No. 66.) On February 16, the parties filed an Agreed Stipulation of Facts and jointly requested that the Court decide the motion without the introduction of further…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Potter v. City of TontitownSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
  2. In Re: Tracey L. SchickCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
  3. Claussen v. Brookings County (In Re Claussen)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Dakota · 1990
  4. Weas v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
  5. In re BallingerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2013

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API