East Rutherford Building & Loan Ass'n v. McKenzie
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Howell, who filed the following opinion: “This suit was brought by the East Rutherford Savings, Loan .and Building Association against Margaret Stewart McKenzie, the widow, and Henry M. Ladd, the executor of the will of William McIvenzie, deceased, for the purpose of determining the title to some shares of stock of the complainant corporation which were claimed by both the widow and the executor.
Read the full summary
On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Howell, who filed the following opinion: “This suit was brought by the East Rutherford Savings, Loan .and Building Association against Margaret Stewart McKenzie, the widow, and Henry M. Ladd, the executor of the will of William McIvenzie, deceased, for the purpose of determining the title to some shares of stock of the complainant corporation which were claimed by both the widow and the executor. What is claimed to be the evidence of the ownership of the shares is on deposit with, the clerk of this court and consists…
1Per curiam
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Howell.
For affirmance—The Chiee-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisci-i, Black, Wi-iite, Heppeniieimer, Gardner—13. For reversal—None.
2Cited by14 opinions
- Holmes EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
- In Re Estate of HutchisonOhio Supreme Court · 1929
- New Jersey Title Guarantee & Trust Co. v. ArchibaldSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1919
- Holt v. BaylesUtah Supreme Court · 1934
- Commercial Trust Co. v. WhiteNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1926
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.