Legal Opinion
Cable Co. v. Richardson
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided April 8, 1992No. 23475-CAPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARVIN, Chief Judge.
In this 1989 action for the balance owed on a 1977 revolving loan account agreement by a bank customer, which was dismissed on the customer’s exception of prescription, the creditor appeals.
The trial court agreed with the customer’s contentions that the agreement was an “agreement to lend money,” subject to the three-year prescription of CC Art. 3494, and that the last payment on the agreement occurred in 1986, more than three years before the action was instituted on October 30, 1989.
The creditor contends that the agreement was a “non-negotiable promissory note,” subject…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Pearson v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1973
- DeRouin v. HinphyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1968
- Fejta v. Werner Enterprises, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1982
- Foster v. Manville Forest Products Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1985
- Glass v. BellLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1950
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Yin v. Society National Bank IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
- SMS Fin. 30, L. L.C. v. Frederick D. Harris, M.D., Inc., Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County2018
- Dixie Web Graphic Corp. v. SharpLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1993
- Marquez Vargas v. RRA CP Opportunity Tr. 1Washington Supreme Court · 2026
- Yin v. Society National Bank IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996