Antol v. Dayton Malleable Iron Co.
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By GEIGER, PJ.
This matter is before this court on appeal on questions of law and fact from a final order heretofore made by the court of common pleas. It is not necessary to recite in detail the allegations of the second amended petition except generally to state that it alleges causes of action against the defendant. for nuisances arising out of the operation of defendant’s factory near plaintiff’s property. The plaintiff alleges that the defendant, unless restrained, will continue to operate its plant to the impairment of plaintiff’s *496personal and realty rights, and prays that…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Norris v. United Mineral Products Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1945
- Hughes v. Baltimore & Ohio Rd. Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1951