Legal Opinion

Shook v. New York Life Insurance

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 1, 1941No. Appeal, 98PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Schaffer,

Plaintiff sues to recover $3,000, claimed to be due to ber by defendant, on a life insurance policy covering ber fifteen year old son. Recovery was had in tbe court below. From tbe refusal to enter judgment in its favor tbe insurance company appeals.

In June, 1935, plaintiff and ber husband decided to take out a policy on each of tbeir lives and also one on tbeir fifteen year old son. Tbe son’s application, signed by bim, and dated June 1, 1935, stipulates: “It is mutually agreed as follows: 1. That tbe insurance hereby applied for shall not take effect…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Eaton v. N.Y. Life Ins. Co. of N.Y.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  2. Landy v. Philadelphia Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  3. Harrisburg Trust Co. v. Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  4. Katchmer v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Blouch v. Clifford R. Zinn & Son, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Blouch v. Clifford R. Zinn & Son, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API