Legal Opinion

Lamarca v. Kissell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 16, 2000PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied plaintiffs motion for summary judgment and granted defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the amended complaint in this action seeking reformation of an opting-out agreement stipulated to by the parties on July 29, 1992 and incorporated into a judgment of divorce. Plaintiff asserts that both parties agreed that defendant would receive a share of plaintiff’s monthly retirement pension, then in “pay status”, as calculated pursuant to the formula set forth in Majauskas v Majauskas (61 NY2d…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Chimart Associates v. PaulNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Majauskas v. MajauskasNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. George Backer Management Corp. v. Acme Quilting Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Surlak v. SurlakAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  5. Nash v. KornblumNew York Court of Appeals · 1962

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dwyer v. DwyerNew York Supreme Court · 2001
  2. KeyBank National Association v. Beauty Quest Skincare, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2022
  3. Stache Invs. Corp. v. CiolekAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API