Lamarca v. Kissell
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied plaintiffs motion for summary judgment and granted defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the amended complaint in this action seeking reformation of an opting-out agreement stipulated to by the parties on July 29, 1992 and incorporated into a judgment of divorce. Plaintiff asserts that both parties agreed that defendant would receive a share of plaintiff’s monthly retirement pension, then in “pay status”, as calculated pursuant to the formula set forth in Majauskas v Majauskas (61 NY2d…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Chimart Associates v. PaulNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Majauskas v. MajauskasNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- George Backer Management Corp. v. Acme Quilting Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Surlak v. SurlakAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Nash v. KornblumNew York Court of Appeals · 1962
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Dwyer v. DwyerNew York Supreme Court · 2001
- KeyBank National Association v. Beauty Quest Skincare, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2022
- Stache Invs. Corp. v. CiolekAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2026