Fifth and York Company v. United States
District Court, W.D. Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
BROOKS, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff seeks to recover for additional taxes it paid subsequent to determination by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue of a deficiency in its income tax liability resulting from the Commissioner’s finding that plaintiff had erroneously omitted from its 1954 taxable income one-half of its gross profits attributable to certain sales made in that year.
In 1954, the plaintiff was engaged in the retail sale of automobiles, keeping its accounts and records on the accrual method of accounting. In addition to its regular sales, in 1954 plaintiff also made 96 “Two-for-One”…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- North American Oil Consolidated v. BurnetSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Spring City Foundry Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Brown v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- American Automobile Assn. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Schulde v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Farrara v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1965
- Hagen Advertising Displays, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1966
- Hagen Advertising Displays, Inc., an Ohio Corporation v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1969
- Farrara v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1965
- Hagen Advertising Displays, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1966
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.