Legal Opinion
Di Paola v. International Terminal Operating Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 23, 1968No. 64 Civ. 1008PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MANSFIELD, District Judge.
In this action by a pier worker to re-. cover damages for personal injuries, defendant International Terminal Operating Co., Inc. (“ITO”) has moved pursuant to Rule 56(b), F.R.Civ.P., for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction.
The complaint originally based jurisdiction on diversity of citizenship, but during a pretrial conference it became apparent that the Court lacked diversity jurisdiction. As a result, the parties stipulated in the pretrial order that plaintiff’s complaint be deemed amended “to…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Crumady v. the Joachim Hendrik FisserSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Gutierrez v. Waterman Steamship Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Atlantic Transport Co. of W. Va. v. ImbrovekSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- North Pacific Steamship Co. v. Hall Bros. Marine Railway & Shipbuilding Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Waterman Steamship Corp. v. Dugan & McNamara, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Raymond E. Pryor, Personal Representative of the Estate of Marion L. Stephens, Deceased v. American President LinesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1975
- Gebhard v. S.S. Hawaiian LegislatorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- Bailiff v. Storm Drilling CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 1972
- Archie Miller v. A/b Svenska Amerika Linien v. J.A. McCarthy Inc. (3rd Party Defendant)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
- Harris v. Waikane Corp.District Court, D. Hawaii · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.