Legal Opinion · Dissent

Isaacson v. Dorius

Utah Supreme Court

Decided August 17, 1983No. 18166Published

1DissentStewart, Justice

I respectfully submit that the notice of appeal should be deemed timely filed in this case. Counsel acted prudently in attempting to effectuate a timely filing of a notice of appeal in accordance with our rules of procedure. The reason the notice was not actually filed with the court in the time prescribed by the rules was either because of the delay in the delivery of mail or because of the failure of the clerk to file the notice promptly upon receipt.1 In either event, the fault was not the appellant’s. Indeed the appellant had the right to rely on the mail’s being delivered in time and on…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Alvera M. Aldabe v. Charles D. AldabeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  2. Alejandro Sanchez v. Board of Regents of Texas Southern UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  3. United States v. Edward Elmer Solly Appeal of Charles J. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
  4. United States v. NunleyDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API