Legal Opinion
Burchinell v. Bennett
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided January 15, 1898No. 1231PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Error to the District Court of Arapahoe County.
1Opinion of the CourtBissell, J.
The San Francisco Tea Company was a Colorado corporation doing business in the city of Denver. On the 2d of April, 1895, the corporation gave a mortgage on its stock to Mrs. Donnelly, to secure the payment of a promissory note due on demand for a little upwards of $6,000. Con*503currently with the execution of the security, the company turned over its stock to Mrs. Donnelly, who went into possession and proceeded to take an inventory. She lured clerks, and the former officers and manager of the company went out and surrendered the keys. The following day some other creditors of the company…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Richardson's v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Buell v. Buckingham & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1864
- Fogg v. BlairSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Jones v. Bank of LeadvilleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1887
- Henderson v. Indiana Trust Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1895
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Beaver Park Co. v. HobsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1929
- Bailey v. American National BankColorado Court of Appeals · 1898
- Bailey v. American National BankColorado Court of Appeals · 1898