Legal Opinion

Donovick v. Seattle-First National Bank

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1988No. 54412-3Published

1Opinion of the Court

111 Wn.2d 413 (1988)

757 P.2d 1378

MIKE DONOVICK, Petitioner,

v.

SEATTLE-FIRST NATIONAL BANK, Respondent.

No. 54412-3.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

July 15, 1988.

McGavick, Graves, Beale & McNerthney, by Malcolm C. Lindquist and James W. Feltus, for petitioner.

Ingram, Zelasko & Goodwin, by Arthur A. Blauvelt III, for respondent.

BRACHTENBACH, J.

The issue is whether two separate deeds of trust on separate properties, securing one obligation, may be nonjudicially foreclosed in separate sales, one sale immediately following the other? The trial court held the foreclosures were valid; the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cox v. HeleniusWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Donovick v. Seattle-First National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Felton v. Citizens Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State v. ParkerWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Marketing Unlimited, Inc. v. Jefferson Chemical Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API