Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Coogan
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
The relator, the Cincinnati Bar Association, filed the complaint in tMs matter on October 9, 1967.
The respondent, James H. Coogan, is 32 years old and was admitted to the OMo Bar in 1961.
The respondent’s first answer to the complaint raised tbe question of mental illness as a defense and, therefore, a hearing upon the complaint was delayed.
A doctor examined the respondent and made a report, dated April 29, 1968, as follows:
“It is not possible on the basis of tMs examination to make a diagnosis of any mental illness wMch would be of significance under Section 5122.01(A), Eevised Code. * * * at…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Coogan v. Cincinnati Bar AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1970
- William and Mary Lou Castorr v. John M. BrundageCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
- Coogan v. Cincinnati Bar AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1970
- In re Reinstatement of CooganOhio Supreme Court · 1973