People v. Gordon
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtMalone Jr., J.
On this appeal, defendant first contends that her robbery convictions are not supported by legally sufficient evidence. We agree. Robbery in the first degree and robbery in the second degree, as charged in counts 1, 2 and 6 of the indictment, require the People to prove that a defendant “forcibly [stole] property” (Penal Law §§ 160.15 [3]; 160.10 [1], [2] [a]). As relevant here, forcible stealing is defined as using or threatening to use “physical force upon another person for the purpose of. . . [p] reventing or overcoming resistance to the taking of the property or to the retention thereof…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. CabanNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
- People v. IrizarryNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- People v. LuciaNew York Court of Appeals · 1965
- People v. Di BellaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.