Hammill v. Pennsylvania Railroad
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On rule to show cause why verdict should not be set aside.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Lippincott, J.
This was an action by the plaintiff against the defendant to recover damages for injuries occasioned by the alleged negligence of the defendant. The plaintiff contended that the proximate cause of the accident and consequent injuries to him was the neglect of the defendant, the railroad company, to give the statutory signal of the approach of its train towards the crossing over the railroad tracks at First street, in the town of Harrison, in the county ■of Hudson.
The plaintiff, at the time of the accident to him, was standing on a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Milwaukee & Saint Paul Railway Co. v. KelloggSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Baltimore & Potomac Railroad v. ReaneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1875
- Phillips v. Library Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1893
- City of Atchison v. KingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872
3Cited by8 opinions
- Glaser v. Hackensack Water Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
- Avedisian v. Admiral Realty Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
- J. Ray Arnold Lumber Co. v. CarterSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
- Devoe v. New York, Ontario & Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1899
- Mella v. Northern S. S. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1908
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.