Legal Opinion
In re the Estate of Ratta
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided June 12, 1985PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
C. Raymond Radigan, J.
In this proceeding by an administratrix for judicial settlement of her accounts, a creditor objects to petitioner’s failure to apportion among all persons interested in the estate the sum of $65,555.42 shown as unpaid administration expenses on schedule C-l.
The decedent left a gross taxable estate of $373,139 the bulk of which, or the sum of $345,000 consisted of the proceeds of a life insurance policy and an employee death benefit fund that were paid directly to the named beneficiaries, a former spouse and decedent’s sons. The assets passing through…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- In re the Estate of PottsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
- In re the Estate of PiccioneNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- In re the Accounting of GenoveseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
- In re the Estate of GalewitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957
- In Re the Accounting of GenoveseNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Commonwealth v. MourarSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- In re the Estate of GilliganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Commonwealth v. Hoyle, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Chester County1988
- Commonwealth v. MourarSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- In re WarmsleyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.