Legal Opinion

Fallon v. Amond

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 18, 1911PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Webster District Court. — Hon. C. G. Lee, Judge. Action to recover damages for breach of contract. There was a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff. The defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtSherwin, C. J.

The parties to this action are adjoining landowners; the plaintiff owning the S. W. *4 of section 3, and the defendant the S. E. % and the N. % of section 4. One A. O. Schultze owns the N. E. 14 of section 5 and the S. W. ]4 of section 33, which lies immediately north of the defendant’s N. W. % of section 4. In the early part of 1905, the parties entered into an agreement, whereby they were to construct -an open ditch across a part of the defendant’s land down to and across the quarter section owned by the plaintiff, and pursuant to this agreement they bought a ditching machine and constructed…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Carraher v. AllenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
  2. Iowa-Minnesota Land Co. v. ConnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  3. Varner v. St. L. & C. R. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1881
  4. Robinson v. LutherSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  5. Jones v. StoverSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hansen v. AndersenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1955
  2. Armstrong Paving Products, Inc. v. NielsenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1932
  3. Abney v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  4. Hansen v. AndersenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API