Mode v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Sam Robinson, Associate Justice.
Appellant, Lee Mode, was charged with first degree murder. He appeals from a conviction of second degree murder.
One of the points argued by appellant is that the evidence is not sufficient to sustain the verdict. This point is not well taken. There was bad blood between Mode and the deceased, Russell. This grew out of Mode’s alleged attentions to Mrs. Russell. It appears that on another occasion Russell had taken a pistol away from Mode. The State introduced direct and circumstantial evidence to the effect that Mode stepped from a doorway and shot Russell down.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Cogburn v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
- Tignor v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
- Parsley v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1921
- Lovejoy v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1896
3Cited by6 opinions
- Mode v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961
- Mode v. BarnettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1962
- Ellis v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1962
- Brock v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963
- Mode v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.