Legal Opinion

Heuschel v. Wagner

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 7, 1923No. 10,601PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Denison

Upon an allowance by the county court- in the matter of the estate of Frank L. Heuschel the widow brings error and moves for supersedeas. The claim was filed by Bertha H. Wagner and Thelma Alta Blue and Lloyd George Blue, minors, for “bal. due on partnership settlement with deceased, one-half to Bertha H. Wagner and one-half to *328above named minors to be paid from estate of deceased at death of deceased, two-thirds of............$4,000.00 or a total amount due $2,666.67”. The administrator refused to defend and the widow was allowed to do so. An allowance was made of $1,333.33 to Bertha Wagner.…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Goss v. HutchinsTennessee Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Boatright v. DerrSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  3. Camellia Diced Cream Company v. ChanceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960
  4. Goodknight v. HarperSupreme Court of Colorado · 1924
  5. Heuschkel v. WagnerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API