Legal Opinion

Bertolacci v. Union Paving Co.

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County

Decided December 2, 1932No. 16667Published

1Opinion of the Court

MacNeille, J.,

We are considering defendant’s petition and rule for judgment of non pros. A summons in trespass issued August 23, 1928, which was returned nihil habet. Although this summons had not been served, a statement of claim was filed, and, on November 5,1928, the defendant took a rule to strike off the statement of claim. This rule was made absolute December 10,1928, and thereafter, on December 16, 1930, an alias summons in trespass was issued.

We are now asked to make absolute the defendant’s rule for judgment of non pros, on the ground of the running of the statute of limitation.

The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lobb v. Pennsylvania Cement Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  2. Kraus v. American Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API