Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Turner v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 24, 1955No. 4788Published

1ConcurrenceEd. F. McFaddin, Justice

There is one point in this case that has given me most serious concern : it relates to the refusal of the Trial Court to allow Turner’s attorneys to cross-examine Drs. Drewrey and Pruitt. But after reading the transcript, I have concluded that no error was committed under the situation existing. I am concurring to give the reasons for my conclusions on this point.

Here was the situation existing:(1) Turner’s attorneys filed a motion that he be committed to the State Hospital for examination as to sanity. The Court denied that motion; but — at the request of the defendant — appointed Dr. L. E.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Formby v. Fulk, JudgeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1948
  2. Kelley v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1922
  3. Duncan v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1913
  4. Wilhite v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
  5. Lambert v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API