Turner v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1ConcurrenceEd. F. McFaddin, Justice
There is one point in this case that has given me most serious concern : it relates to the refusal of the Trial Court to allow Turner’s attorneys to cross-examine Drs. Drewrey and Pruitt. But after reading the transcript, I have concluded that no error was committed under the situation existing. I am concurring to give the reasons for my conclusions on this point.
Here was the situation existing:(1) Turner’s attorneys filed a motion that he be committed to the State Hospital for examination as to sanity. The Court denied that motion; but — at the request of the defendant — appointed Dr. L. E.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Formby v. Fulk, JudgeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1948
- Kelley v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1922
- Duncan v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1913
- Wilhite v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
- Lambert v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1948