Legal Opinion
Paivinen v. Sands
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided February 11, 1965No. 7226PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
*1031 On Petition for Correction of Opinion
Pee Curiam :
By order of the Court, appellee’s petition for correction of opinion dated January 11, 1965, is granted only to the extent of changing the language of the original opinion as follows:
On page 21, lines 3 and 4, change comma after the word “oscilloscope” to a period, and delete the remainder of the sentence.
2Cited by1 opinion
- William Andrew Washington v. Donald ClemmerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964