Legal Opinion
Merritt-Chapman & Scott Corporation v. Public Utility District No. 2 of Grant County, Washington
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided August 6, 1963No. 164, Docket 27783Published
1Opinion
On Petition for Rehearing
2Per curiam
We have received and have given careful consideration to the supplemental *114briefs submitted by the parties in accordance with our memorandum filed May 17, 1963, and the brief submitted by the Attorney General of the State of New York, as amicus curiae. We reaffirm the views expressed in our original opinion and deny the petition for rehearing. There will be no further oral argument.
It is quite true that no New York court has ever stated the applicable rule in precisely the manner formulated by us. On the other hand, no case seems to have arisen presenting the special…
3Cases cited16 opinions
- Larson v. Domestic and Foreign Commerce Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad v. GeorgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Darlington v. . Mayor, C., of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
- Brown v. Board of TrusteesNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
- In Re Deansville Cemetery Ass'n to Acquire Title to Lands of MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.