Legal Opinion

Forgie v. Duff Manuf'g Co.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided July 19, 1897PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Pennsylvania.

1Opinion of the Court

KIRKPATRICK, District Judge.

' This matter comes before the court on an appeal from a decree of the circuit court for the Western district of Pennsylvania (78 Fed. 626), granting to the complainants a preliminary injunction based upon two patents, No. 455,-993, July 14, 1891, and No. 527,102, October 9, 1894, issued to Josiah Barrett, and assigned to the Duff Manufacturing Company. The claims involved are 1 and 6 of patent No. 455,993, and claim 19 of patent No. 527,102; but, inasmuch, as the defendant, in his answer, consents that decree be made against him as to claim 19, patent No.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Western Electric Co. v. LaRueSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Duff Manuf'g Co. v. ForgieU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania · 1893
  3. Duff Manuf'g Co. v. ForgieU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania · 1897

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Duff Mfg. Co. v. Kalamazoo Railroad Velocipede & Car Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Michigan · 1898
  2. Duff Mfg. Co. v. NortonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1899
  3. Duff Mfg. Co. v. Kalamazoo Railroad Velocipede & Car Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Michigan · 1900
  4. Duff Mfg. Co. v. NortonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API