Legal Opinion

Stephens v. M. C. of Crisfield

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 15, 1914PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Somerset County (Stanford, J.). The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court. The cause was submitted to Boyd, C. J., Briscoe, Burke, Thomas, Pattison, Urner, Stockbridge and Constable, JJ.

1Opinion of the CourtConstable, J.

By sec. 87 of the Charter of Crisfield, as amended by Oh. 529 of the Acts of 1910 (p. 1094), the Mayor and Council are vested with the control of the streets of said town and, among other things, are empowered to widen any of the existing streets. Provision is therein made for the appointment of examiners, and their course of procedure is prescribed. After the performance of their duties, return is made by them to the Mayor and Council of their findings, which, after due notice to tlxe interested parties, is set for hearing and “may be ratified or rejected or altered and amended.” Anyone…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Rayner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1879
  2. New York Mining Co. v. Midland Mining Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1904
  3. Webster v. CockeyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1850
  4. Baltimore & Havre-de-Grace Turnpike Co. v. Northern Central Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1860
  5. Wilmington & Susquehanna Rail Road v. CondonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1837

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Gisriel v. Ocean City Board of Supervisors of ElectionsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  2. Board of Medical Examiners v. StewardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
  3. Close v. Southern Maryland Agricultural Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1919
  4. Prince George's County v. Beretta U.S.A. Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  5. Murrell v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API