Legal Opinion

In re Bush

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 1891PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Contempt of Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court, by

Judd, C.J.

On the sworn information of the Attorney-General, the respondent was cited to appear before the Court, to show cause why he should not be adjudged guilty of a contempt of Court for the publication of an article in a newspaper published in Honolulu, called “ Ka Leo o Ka Lahui,” in its issue of February 5th, instant.

On the 11th of February respondent moved that the rule be discharged on the grounds :

“ 1. The act complained of in the petition, upon which said rule is based, is not, in law, a contempt of Court for which this Court has power to punish this…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ex parte SmithHawaii Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Coll v. DeshaHawaii Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Ex parte SmithHawaii Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Ex parte SmithHawaii Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Fernandes v. FernandesHawaii Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API