Legal Opinion
Peterson v. Warner
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided May 30, 1985No. 4-584A121PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RATLIFF, Presiding Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Clarence and Maurice Peterson (the Pe-tersons) appeal the granting of summary judgment in favor of Edward V. Warner (Warner) finding Warner was the owner of a certain parcel of land in Lake County. We affirm.
FACTS
In the early 1970's the property taxes on the real estate in issue were unpaid resulting in the property being placed on the delinquent tax rolls. The property, which belonged to Warner at the time, was offered for sale in 19783 by the Lake County Treasurer's Office to collect the unpaid taxes. Because no one bid the statutory minimum…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Suyemasa v. MyersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
- Allen v. GilkisonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1921
- Dixon v. ThompsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
- Lenard v. AdamsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
- Knotts v. TuxburyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Smith v. BreedingIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
- City of Gary v. BelovichIndiana Court of Appeals · 1987
- Joshua Lindsey v. Adam NeherIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
- Northern Industries v. BD. OF COM'RS OF CTY. OF DELAWAREIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
- BD. OF COM'RS OF CTY. OF HANCOCK v. ForthIndiana Court of Appeals · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.