Legal Opinion

United States v. Tucker

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided July 17, 2008No. 07-2431PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOKEN, Chief Judge.

Shari Ann Tucker appeals her conviction for being an accessory after the fact to a bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 3. Tucker argues that the evidence was insufficient to support the jury’s verdict and that the district court 1 abused its discretion in permitting the prosecutor to cross examine her based on the bank robber’s testimonial statement to FBI investigators. (She also raised a sentencing issue but conceded at oral argument that the issue became moot when she completed serving her thirty-three-month sentence, thirty months of which were served by…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. Tennessee v. StreetSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Giles v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Coquina Investments v. TD Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
  2. United States v. Lawrence WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
  3. DECAY v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009
  4. United States v. Jesus Hernando Angulo MosqueraCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018
  5. United States v. CharboneauCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API