United States v. Tucker
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
LOKEN, Chief Judge.
Shari Ann Tucker appeals her conviction for being an accessory after the fact to a bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 3. Tucker argues that the evidence was insufficient to support the jury’s verdict and that the district court 1 abused its discretion in permitting the prosecutor to cross examine her based on the bank robber’s testimonial statement to FBI investigators. (She also raised a sentencing issue but conceded at oral argument that the issue became moot when she completed serving her thirty-three-month sentence, thirty months of which were served by…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Tennessee v. StreetSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Giles v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Coquina Investments v. TD Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
- United States v. Lawrence WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
- DECAY v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009
- United States v. Jesus Hernando Angulo MosqueraCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018
- United States v. CharboneauCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.