Legal Opinion
Allen v. City of Antioch
District Court, N.D. California
Decided September 9, 2024No. 3:23-cv-01895Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA TRENT ALLEN, et al., Case No. 23-cv-01895-VC Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS RODRIGUEZ AND PRIETO'S CITY OF ANTIOCH, et al., MOTION TO DISMISS Defendants. Re: Dkt. No. 167 The motion is granted in part and denied in part. This order assumes the reader’s familiarity with the facts, relevant legal standards, and arguments made by the parties. 1. Pugh’s Section 1983 claim based on excessive force stemming from the November 2020 incident is dismissed.1 Pugh’s counsel conceded at the hearing that this…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America, Local 610 v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Florian Sever v. Alaska Pulp Corporation Dennis Huse George Woodbury Jesse Cline Frank Roppel George Ishiyama Wayne Funk Ralph Fenner, Florian Sever v. Alaska Pulp Corporation Dennis Huse George Woodbury Jesse Cline Frank Roppel George Ishiyama Wayne Funk Ralph FennerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Knox v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Gabbi Lemos v. County of SonomaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.