Legal Opinion · Dissent

Horwitz v. Michael Reese Hospital

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 30, 1970No. 53107Published

1Dissent

Mr. PRESIDING JUSTICE DIERINGER

dissenting:

I respectfully dissent. This is another unfortunate episode in this litigation. To get a trial, plaintiff had to obtain a writ of mandamus. (People ex rel. Horwitz v. Canel (1966), 34 Ill.2d 306.) When she obtained a trial, the Circuit Court directed a verdict for the manufacturer of the incubator. Although the hospital defended solely on the issue of the casual relationship between the May 13, 1947, incident and the abnormal conditions of the child over a 20 year span, the majority holds she is not entitled to recover against the hospital,…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Pedrick v. Peoria & Eastern RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Williams v. Brown Manufacturing Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Lindroth v. Walgreen Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Dunham v. Vaughan & Bushnell Mfg. Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1969
  5. People Ex Rel. General Motors Corp. v. BuaIllinois Supreme Court · 1967

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API