Legal Opinion

Griffith v. Hulion

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided November 23, 1925PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Brown, J.-

-Appellee Hulion exhibited his bill for the enforcement by foreclosure on certain real and personal property of a lien claimed by him for certain work done by him as a "woods rider” for defendant Frink on a turpentine place formerly belonging to Frink and which had been sold and conveyed by the latter to defendants Griffith and Smith subject to a mortgage claimed to have been executed by Frink to the West Florida Naval Stores Company prior to Hulion’s employment. The purchasers, Griffith and Smith, the vendor Frink and the said mortgagee, Naval Stores Company, were all made parties…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bear Lake & River Water Works & Irrigation Co. v. GarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Peoples Bank v. ArbuckleSupreme Court of Florida · 1921
  3. McClusky v. TrusselMississippi Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Richbourg v. RoseSupreme Court of Florida · 1907
  5. Palm Beach Bank & Trust Co. v. LainhartSupreme Court of Florida · 1922

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. United States v. Turner Turpentine Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1940
  2. Guaranty Title & Trust Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
  3. Summerlin v. Orange Shores, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1929
  4. Pridgen v. MurphyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
  5. Southern Attractions v. GrauSupreme Court of Florida · 1956

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API