Marshall v. Ford
Appellate Court of Illinois
Action on the case for personal injuries. Error to the Superior Court of Cook County;' the Hon. Robert W. Weight, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1905.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Freeman
It is said in helialf of the defendant in error that the writ of error must be dismissed and the judgment affirmed because the trial judg’e did not seal the bill of exceptions and because it is not made to appear in the record that it contains all the evidence offered or introduced at the trial. Why the first of these objections should be. made we are at a loss to understand, in view of the fact that the bill of exceptions is both signed and sealed by the trial judge. As to the second objection, we are of opinion that while the customary statement that the bill of exceptions contains all the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Mullin v. JohnsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1901
- American Malting Co. v. LeliveltAppellate Court of Illinois · 1902
- Anderberg v. Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1901
- Eckhart & Swan Milling Co. v. SchaeferAppellate Court of Illinois · 1905