Legal Opinion

Newsom v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided May 6, 1931No. 14396Published

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

Appellant, through his counsel, challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict.

The following is a synopsis of the evidence: Newsom, the appelant, James, the deceased, and three other persons, came in an automobile' to a place called Hamon’s Store, at which there was a filling station. James brought a tire to one of the attendants and sought to have it repaired. It was not in a condition permitting repair, and after some conversation between Newsom and James, Newsom declared that if James “would stay with him,” they would make…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hudson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
  2. Henderson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1909
  3. Price v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API