Stupar v. Bank of Westmont
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hallett
The plaintiffs filed a petition for the registration (under the Uniform Enforcement of Foreign Judgments Act, Ill. Rev. Stat. 1971, ch. 77, pars. 88-105), of a judgment in their favor against the Bank of Westmont, entered in Arizona, under its “long-arm” statute. Thé trial court refused registration on the ground that the Arizona court was without jurisdiction over the Bank. The plaintiffs appeal, contending that the Arizona court did have jurisdiction. We agree and reverse and remand the case for such registration.
In October, 1971, Edna Trybulski, a widow, and her son William Stupar bought a…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re Adoption of LucasAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
- Detroit Teachers Credit Union v. GoldmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995