Legal Opinion
State v. Boardwalk Regency Corp.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided July 20, 1988PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Per curiam
The Boardwalk Regency Corporation, the operator of Caesars Boardwalk Regency Hotel/Casino (Caesars) appeals from a decision of the Casino Control Commission (Commission) finding it violated N.J.S.A. 5:12-119(b) by allowing two underage *551persons to gamble. Civil penalties totalling $2,000 were assessed. We now affirm.
I
On August 8, 1986 the Division of Gaming Enforcement (Division) filed a civil complaint with the Commission alleging that on two occasions Caesars had violated N.J.S.A. 5:12-119(b) by allowing two underage persons to gamble in the licensed Casino.1 The Commission filed the civil…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Mayflower Securities Co. v. Bureau of SecuritiesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
- Campbell v. Department of Civil ServiceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1963
- State v. MeinkenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- In Re Petition of Adamar of New Jersey, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
- In Re GaraySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ayhan Hakimoglu v. Trump Taj Mahal Associates Trump Taj Mahal, Inc. Donald Trump the Trump Taj Mahal Corporation Tm/gp Corporation. Ayhan Hakimoglu v. Boardwalk Regency CorpCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Hakimoglu v. Trump Taj Mahal AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Hakimoglu v. Trump Taj Mahal AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Phillip Joshua Kyle Brooks v. Timothy McKimmieDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2026