Rosenberg v. Township of South Orange
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
1Per curiam
This appeal from an interlocutory determination in the Tax Court is before us upon a grant by the Supreme Court of leave to appeal.
We affirm substantially for the reasons articulated by Judge Hopkins in his opinion of March 15, 1983, 8 N.J.Tax 1 (Tax.Ct.1983). It is clear from that that he did not feel bound by the opinion of the assessor either to approve or disapprove. Nor do we think the assessor’s consent is necessary to the approval of such a settlement. But Judge Hopkins concluded that, in the circumstances as they appeared when the proposed settlement was offered to him for approval,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Rosenberg v. Township of South OrangeNew Jersey Tax Court · 1983
3Cited by7 opinions
- Black United Fund Inc. v. City of East OrangeNew Jersey Tax Court · 1998
- Mobil Oil Corp. v. Greenwich TownshipNew Jersey Tax Court · 2002
- Union City Associates v. City of Union CityNew Jersey Tax Court · 1989
- City of Atlantic v. California Avenue Ventures, LLCNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2006
- City of Atlantic v. California Avenue Ventures, LLCNew Jersey Tax Court · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.