Legal Opinion

State v. Langsford

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 27, 2002No. 4D01-3062PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarner, J.

In a prosecution for driving under the influence, the county court suppressed the results of a blood test conducted upon appellee without her consent on the ground it violated section 316.1933, Florida Statutes (2000). The court certified the following question at the request of the state:

In light of Bernie v. State, 524 So.2d 988 (Fla.1988), which holds that Florida is prohibited from giving greater protections than those contained within the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, has the Third District Court of Appeal, in State v. Slaney, 653 So.2d 422 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995),…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Smith v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Cooper v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hilton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
  2. State v. Wade F. LilesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
  3. Sibley v. SibleyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  4. State v. John N. WillisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API