Legal Opinion

Parsons v. City of Birmingham

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 19, 1931No. 6 Div. 27PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.

Section 1897, Code, prior to the amendment of March 6, 1931, authorized cities and towns to borrow money to the limit prescribed by the Constitution, but did not define the nature of instrument they could execute. The amendment directed that for temporary loans negotiable notes may be executed, payable within twelve months, etc., and shall have the municipal seal attached. Section 222, Constitution, permits a “bond issue” only after an election is held, etc.

Undoubtedly a promissory note under the seal of the maker is a “bond.” But is the execution of such a note under seal a “bond issue” as…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Tyler v. L. L. Jester & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Littlejohn v. LittlejohnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  3. Ramage, Parks & Co. v. FolmarSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Alabama Power Co. v. City of ScottsboroSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  2. O'GRADY v. City of HooverSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  3. Chemical Bank New York Trust Co. v. Steamship WesthamptonDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1964
  4. State ex rel. Anderson v. MurphySupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
  5. O'GRADY v. City of HooverSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API