Legal Opinion
Monroe v. Monsanto Co.
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided January 15, 1982No. Civ. A. 80-918-14PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
WILKINS, District Judge.
This novel question of law in South Carolina arose from a personal injury action. It comes before me on Motion for Summary Judgment by both defendants. On the issue raised, the parties agree that there is no dispute over any material facts, and that only an issue of law is before the Court.
The complaint, filed March 18, 1980, asserts the following:
1. On May 21, 1978 while employed by Fovil Manufacturing Company (Fovil) at its plant near Abbeville, South Carolina, the plaintiff lost his left arm in a machine called a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Chavis v. WatkinsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1971
- Brown v. Moorhead Oil Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1962
- Gordon v. Hollywood-Beaufort Package Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1948
- International Order of Twelve Knights & Daughters of Tabor v. FridiaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
- Strickland v. Textron, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Volb v. G.E. Capital Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
- Robinson v. KFC National Management Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1988
- Poch v. Bayshore Concrete Products/South Carolina, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2013
- Poch v. Bayshore Concrete Products/South Carolina, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2009
- Jacque Lucas v. KapStone Paper & PackagingCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2023
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.