Legal Opinion
State v. Molina
Idaho Court of Appeals
Decided December 14, 1993No. 19668PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SILAK, Acting Judge.
Jose Molina entered a conditional plea of guilty to possession of marijuana with intent to deliver, reserving his right to appeal the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence. On appeal, Molina asserts the district court should have excluded the challenged evidence because there was no probable cause to issue the search warrant which led to the discovery and seizure of the evidence. For the reasons stated below, we affirm the district court’s denial of Molina’s suppression motion.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
On February 7, 1991, the Canyon County…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Nathanson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- State v. LangIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. YagerIdaho Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. CarlsonIdaho Court of Appeals · 2000
- State v. ChandlerIdaho Court of Appeals · 2004
- State v. BeldenIdaho Court of Appeals · 2009
- State v. TurpinIdaho Court of Appeals · 1997
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.