Legal Opinion

In re Road in Manheim Township

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 18, 1923No. Appeal, No. 27PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal, No. 27, March T., 1923, by W. F. Dusman, from order of Q. S. York Co., Oct. Sessions, 1920, No. 1, extending the time for filing the report of viewers in the case of Road in Manheim Township, York County. ■ Exceptions to report of viewers. Before Wanner, P, J. The opinion of the Superior Court states the case. Error assigned, among others, was in continuing the time for filing the report of viewers.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Trexler, J.,

The order of the court of quarter sessions to view and change part of a public road in Manheim Township, was issued November 29,1920, and the viewers were directed to make report of their proceedings to the said court at the next term thereof. The next term began January 3, 1921. On the first day of the term the court allowed an amendment of the petition on which the viewers had been appointed, changing one of the termini of the road therein set forth. The authority of the court to do this is not questioned. On the 10th day of January during the same term the court…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re Road in Salem TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1883
  2. Springbrook RoadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1870
  3. In re Opening of Knox StreetSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
  4. Sewickley Township RoadSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1904

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. East Lake Road and Payne Ave.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  2. Steigler v. for Road in Peach Bottom Twp., York Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API