Legal Opinion

Kane v. Miller

Montana Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 1993No. 92-317PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Weber

Appellant Karren Kane appeals the order of the District Court of the Eighth Judicial District, Cascade County, which granted defendant Billy Miller’s motion for summary judgment in a legal malpractice action. We affirm.

We find the following issue dispositive:

Whether the District Court erred by granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment.

Ms. Kane’s legal malpractice action originated from Mr. Miller’s representation in a proceeding initiated by the State to obtain permanent custody of Ms. Kane’s son JEH and to terminate her parental rights. Mr. Miller replaced Ms. Kane’s former public…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lorash v. EpsteinMontana Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Merzlak v. PurcellMontana Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Berens v. WilsonMontana Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Kinniburgh v. GarrityMontana Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Christopherson v. White, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1991

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In re A.S.Montana Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Hajenga v. SchweinMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Mills v. MatherMontana Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Boyes v. EddieMontana Supreme Court · 1998
  5. In Re AsMontana Supreme Court · 2004

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API