Legal Opinion

Peyton Du-Pont Securities Co. v. Commissioner of Int. Rev.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided August 29, 1933No. 412PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHASE, Circuit Judge.

In 1923, the petitioner and three other corporations, Southern Menhaden Corpora tion, Melntosh-Morello Orchards Company, Inc., and Charles J. Maxwell & Co., which will hereafter be referred to as Menhaden, Orchards, and Maxwell, occupied the same offices, had interlocking directorates, were operated together by the same persons, and were financed by the petitioner.

Separate returns were filed for 1922 by the petitioner, by Menhaden, and by Maxwell. The commissioner did not thereafter grant permission to filo a consolidated return. Petitioner was organized in May, 1922, and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. S. S. White Dental Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Handy & Harman v. BurnetSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Corn Exchange Bank v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
  4. Alameda Inv. Co. v. McLaughlinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1929
  5. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Adolph Hirsch & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Helvering v. Russian Finance & Construction CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935
  2. Barker v. MagruderCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
  3. Automobile Ins. Co. of Hartford v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
  4. Little v. HelveringCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935
  5. Montgomery v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1938

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API