Legal Opinion

Trusler v. Grigsby

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided July 26, 1955No. 2679Published

1Opinion of the Court

*208OPINION

Riner, Chief Justice.

Anna L. Trusler and her husband, Albert Ray Trusler, as plaintiffs brought their action in the district court of Sheridan County to cancel a mineral deed by which the wife had conveyed to one Foster C. Grigsby an undivided one-half interest in all the oil, gas, and other minerals in and under and that may be produced from certain lands in Sheridan County, Wyoming, described as follows: SW¼NE¼, SE¼NW¼, E½ SW¼, SE¼ sec. 24, T. 58 N., R. 85 W., sixth principal meridian, containing 320 acres more or less. Being unsuccessful in that action, they have brought the case…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Willis v. WillisWyoming Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Jacoby v. City of GilletteWyoming Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Holly Sugar Corp. v. FritzlerWyoming Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Andrejwski v. Wolverine Coal Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Schroetke v. Jackson-Church Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API