Lee v. State

¶ 12. I respectfully dissent from the majority’s affirmance of Lee’s conviction and sentence because in my opinion, he presented un-rebutted testimony that the cocaine was supplied by a confidential informant and this testimony was not unreasonable or improbable on its face. The sole issue presented by Lee, taken verbatim from his brief, is:

WHETHER THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN NOT FINDING THAT LARRY LEE WAS ENTRAPPED AS A MATTER OF LAW GIVEN HIS UNCONTRADICTED TESTIMONY THAT THE CONFIDENTIAL INFORMANT SUPPLIED TO HIM DRUGS THAT WERE LATER PURCHASED BY LAW ENFORCEMENT.

¶ 13. Entrapment is a defense…