Legal Opinion

In Re African-American Slave Descendants Litigation

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided January 26, 2004No. MDL 1491, 02 C 7764PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

NORGLE, District Judge.

Before the court is Plaintiffs’ Motion to Recuse. For the following reasons, the motion is denied.

I. BACKGROUND

On October 25, 2002, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation transferred certain actions to this court for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407. See In re African-American Slave Descendants Litigation, 231 F.Supp.2d 1357 (Jud.Pan. Mult.Lit.2002). This litigation presently consists of nine individual lawsuits.

Upon consolidation of pre-trial proceedings in this court, Plaintiffs agreed to the filing…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Withrow v. LarkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Marshall v. Jerrico, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. C.A. Brokaw v. Mercer County, James Brokaw, Weir BrokawCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
  5. United States v. John M. MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Reichert v. STATE EX REL. McCULLOCHMontana Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Onishi v. ChapleauDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2020
  3. RUFUS v. BALDWIN COUNTY,GEORGIADistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 2024
  4. Reichert v. STATE EX REL. McCULLOCHMontana Supreme Court · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API