Legal Opinion

In Re Nine Applications for Appointment of Counsel in Title VII Proceedings

District Court, N.D. Alabama

Decided August 10, 1979No. CA 79-6-08645PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

GUIN, District Judge.

Nine complainants have applied to this court for appointment of counsel. All seek gratuitous legal representation as plaintiffs in civil suits brought under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, et seq. One provision of that Act, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(f)(l), allows an indigent complainant to apply, “and in such circumstances as the court may deem just, the court may appoint an attorney for such complainant . . ..” Without determining the merits of the claim of any applicant, nor relying on the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Aljoe Poindexter v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
  2. White v. United States Pipe & Foundry Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  3. Sharon D. BROOKS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CENTRAL BANK OF BIRMINGHAM, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
  4. Luna v. International Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace Workers Local 36Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  5. Colbert v. RickmonDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API